Of course we're well aware of China's teeming and progressive population. It is therefore, not in doubt that they'd resort in ways to curb such. One of such ways as today's event revealed is the one-child policy which (according to my inference) deals with family planning and control aimed at dissuading parents from having multiple births within a short specified term.
Nevertheless, the propriety or otherwise of that policy is of minimal concern to me as my attention was drawn more to the horrific incident today wherein one Feng Jianmei was forcibly injected with some chemicals which aborted her seven-month old pregnancy and caused her to have a still birth.
According to her, because she already had a child, local birth-control authorities ordered her to pay a fine of £4,000. She didn't have the money, so a team from the local family planning authority in Shannxi province came to collect her from her home and take her to hospital for the forced abortion.
Recounting the horror, Feng said she told the family planning department she could not pay the fine because her mother-in-law needed money for cancer treatment.
It was then, she claimed, the authorities began their action against her.
She said no less than 20 staff from the family planning department came to her home and placed her under arrest.
As they drove her to the hospital for a forced abortion, she began to resist - resulting in her being beaten.
However, this incident has sparked outrage in China and from human rights activists.
For goodness sake, the kind of laws and policies I come across lately of some countries in our world leaves me to wonder if these laws and policies are actually meant for the good of man ( as law ought to be and as Christ stated it). Yes! It's not in contention that they're set up to prohibit certain ills but then again, if it doesn't ultimately meet up the promotion of good, that to me isn't law.